Wednesday, December 26, 2018

Who me?



 


When I discovered the internet back in the late 1980’s I was delighted to be able to discuss things of interest with other martial artists. Then I discovered the reality, there was a whole lot of shouting getting on, and only occasionally any discussion in depth.

 

But I kept trying to discuss things that interested me, and eventually I found a few that were willing to discuss and share.

 

I always wanted to open wider dialogue, because I was interested in almost everything, but most frequently I only got silence back from those attempts.

 

Jump forward to today, now new tools like Face Book and You Tube, but little has changed.  More so less involved discussion.

 

Of course there are exceptions, I am thankful when I discover them, but so few are willing to get into involved discussion.

 

Now my interests were much more involved that my students had time to follow. My instruction was focused first on addressing their needs, and I worked on that with a few of them continuously for over 30 years. But what I was sharing with them was just a small portion of what I was looking at. What we did study together was of course what was right for them. And they have a most advanced, complex understanding of their art.

 

But there was so much more that I was personally into, from my studies with many and my personal research. Much more than anyone needed.

 

Back about 2008 a friend suggested I start a blog, and I did, The real purpose was to summarize many of the things I studied with them, but more importantly to preserve many other things I was looking at, in case such would prove useful for them in the future, or perhaps for some future student of theirs.

 

I do not believe in hiding such material, making it available for anyone to view.

 

Of course there were many things that I did not place there. Private things for my advanced students which would only make sense for those who trained a long time with me.

And those things I did share with them, but privately.

 

My blog was not designed to teach, rather reinforce things they already knew.

 

And the blog keeps track of how often others view it. Gradually I saw the numbers rise, but never ever heard back from anyone about what I wrote there, (of course there were a scant few, but essentially no one commented.)

 

Much later with the rise of Face Book, I still desiring discussion, never really considering myself an expert, I began to share some of those blog entries. The standard remained, very, very few discussed what I shared. But at the same time the views of my blog kept climbing and climbing and climbing.


Now I have never considered myself an expert, just one who followed the winds of my studies. But I have to consider, have I become an unintentional international expert?

I really do not know. When I get up, I am not so skilled, for I put my trousers on one leg at a time. I care deeply about those who have trained with me, and even more so those who had to move on (which of course was the right decision for them, and that is what I always wanted them to do, make up their own mind.)

There still is so much I do not know and still am working on.

Now unable to have anyone to instruct, I still train and work on my art and my understanding of it.

 

And if I have become an unexpected international expert,
I apologize for not knowing enough to be that.

Sunday, December 23, 2018

To Dim Mak and Beyond or my personal journey through Connect the Dots

 



 
By the mid 1990s  I already had a whole lot of karate. So much so that several lifetimes would be required to share everything with my students (and of course that was not what they wanted).  No question I had many good answers how to drop someone.

 
 

I was not looking for a magic pill. And it was around that time I began to experience the work of Sherman Harrill. But between time with my family (and mowing my huge yard or shoveling my long driveway, constant business travel and work commute from hell, always  focusing on my programs, youth karate, adult karate and my tai chi group) I still had too much free time on my hands (though now I wonder how that was).

 

But constantly reading about the growing fad of meridian striking theories kept my occupied in the back of my mind. There was no time to travel to clinics or desire to spend money on them. So I acquired some books, chief among them was Earl Montague’s books on the Meridians. What impressed me about them was the work he had done to include accurate medical knowledge about them. 


One of my students was my doctor who also was a surgeon, He kept me straight. During frequent visits to my house he would often peruse some of the karate library I accumulated over the years.  


One time time he took a book and threw it in the garbage, explaining if they could not get the location of internal organs correct, why would you trust anything else they wrote as being correct. After all he correctly diagnosed my cancer, assisted in the operation I had, and also made clear only an idiot would ever accept medical advice from me, so I knew he was most likely correct.

 

In my notebooks I preserved drawings and notes I made how kata movement might match with meridian strikes, and so forth.

 

But eventually I  came to realize what was being shown.

 

I took the 5 ‘theories’ explaining meridian strikes and did a most through analysis of what they were saying. (That sort of analysis is how I made my living after all, only in different circumstances). 


What I discovered is that taken together they would always cover any strike at all. Just pick and choose and if it didn’t fit, move to a different theory until you found an answer you liked. That did not appeal to me as logical.

 

I don’t care what others choose to believe. I understand a good technician can make many things work. It just offered nothing sounder that what I already possessed.

 

Then  a sounder reality for me came from continued working with Sherman Harrill.

 

At the clinics I attended with him, and sponsored for him, I was gaining many ways to strike and drop someone. Even to making subtle adjustment to the manner of striking, In fact several of them. My students and I even studied the ‘marks’ from his strikes the day after his clinics, learning ever more.

 

Then he put it most clearly in time. He only used one point. One that started at the top of the head and finished at the bottom of the target’s feet. What he worked towards for decades was a strike, every strike, striking anywhere on the opponents body, and that strike always being able to drop them. And he did just that.

 

No charts, no vital points, no connect the dots. Just the right strike, one tempered with decades on the makiwara.

 

That was all, it was enough.

 

There are many answers after all, Providing man falls down goes boom, that is enough. Technicians, skilled technicians, make them work, even when the underlying theories are diametrically opposed to each other.

 

Among them are the following force multipliers:

 

1.  Serious makiwara and associated strike training.

2. The adjustments to the strike as a force multiplier.

3. The use of alignment as a force multiplier.

4.  Decades of work actually doing the kata, and then actually using the speed of that training as the correct answer to respond to an attack.

5.  Utilization of the correct angle of entry into the attack.

6. Take the next step, use that next step from the kata to accompany the first movement.

   (this gets into the theory behind defining what a technique it)

7. Understand that the direction a strike enters the body yields different results.

8. Using the least amount of force to complete the elimination of the attack.

9.  Consideration of the vital point striking theories.

 

 Of course this list is not complete. They can be applied alone or in combination with others.

 

There are many layers which can work, abet differently. Not one perfect answer.

 

Isshinryu has evolved into many different layers of study. That is reality, but all of them can also become effective. That becomes the role of the instructor to take what level of training that is offered, depending on circumstances, and crafting the students ability to make it always work.

 

No matter that what is chosen does not work the same manner as the other choices.

 

Several related posts from my blog:


 



  

And then there are the vital points to consider:


 

 

 

 

Saturday, December 22, 2018

How I learned what 'bunkai' would mean to me


I am but a product of what I have learned, and that often involved a very different way of thinking about terms many later were using.

 

An example is the term ‘bunkai’.

 

When I learned Isshinryu the term was not used by my instructors, nor by the great majority of instructors I knew. Nor was it a topic of discussion ever at karate tournaments.

 

To be specific in those days a different paradigm, and a most powerful paradigm, was used in my Issshinryu. It did not involve study of kata technique application.

 

About 1980 I was visiting Tristan Sutrisno and eventually the topic came up. Among the discussions were his observations he never saw any senior instructors show kata application as he had learned bunkai to be from his father. Certainly a different time and a different part of the world may have had a lot to do with that.

 

Then he began to explain what ‘bunkai’ meant in his studies. It was never a kyu study, rather it was to be decades of study for the black belt, and continually changing as a different ‘bunkai’ was taught at each black belt level. Those ‘bunkai’ were private strings of explosive movements taken  from many movements points in his family Shotokan kata. Because they were private no one could ever anticipate what they would be. It was a mnemonic to remember many application series. The first level more resembled the kata but very different at the same time. Each of the bunkai when inserted into an attack were capable of ending that attack. And there was also a variant version of the kata, just to keep pushing the black belt mind. The dan level bunkai taught covered various themes.

 

Were so many techniques necessary? Of course not any of them were more than enough to end an attack.

 

But when the goal is continual polishing ones art, having new material to learn and then to master, a great deal of material, keeps the dan pushing their  limits. And of course the mere learning those ‘bunkai’ was just the beginning of the effort that a dan was expected to make and live. Far more engaging was continually working to master all those explanations. Which was most important and also took a long time.

 

Thus very deep dan training  was needed. Literally decades of further study.

 

I am not an expert in this system. Rather someone Sutrisno Sensei chose to explain a bit to.

 
I was only shown a few of the ‘bunkai’, enough to understand what he was talking about.


I remember an early summer camp we had, his senior students showed me the bunkai for Bassai Dai they had just learnt, and  the accompanying first level Bassai Dai bunkai version. Of course I tend to remember what I see, so in one sense I learned it.
 
It was several years later before I saw any video of the JKA version of the bunkai for Bassai Dai. It was very different. Only then did I understand the way they were using the word ‘bunkai’. It had almost no relationship to the Sutrisno version.
 



 
 



Bunkai Bassai Dai Enoeda Sensei


Now I was never Shotokan.  And I had learned that what others wrote or defined a term to mean and then use it that way, would have no bearing on what I actually experienced.

 

I have no video of this, just my memory. But I strongly believe in my memory, and never looked for others explanations to validate what I know.

 

Most simply in the section of Bassai Dai, when the performer turns to the left and delivers a left outside middle block, followed by a right outside middle block, the JKA bunkai for that shown above.

 

In the Sutrisno version of that section the ‘bunkai’ is, ‘the performer turns to the left and delivers a left outside middle block immediately doubled with a right outside idle block, that followed by a right outside middle lock and  then an immediate left outside middle block.

 

Or more simply stated each block is doubled up. This presents a quite different application possibility. For example the initial block is a parry to be followed by the other block as a way to strike into the attacking limb, unto a possible break, or at least a damaging strike to their limb.

 

That of course is but one example. The other ‘bunkai’ for the kata do not follow the same theme.

 

And I came to learn a bit more for other kata. Another time he shared some 3rd and 4th level ‘bunkai’ for several heian kata movements. Just to explain what the themes worked towards.

 

As YouTube made it far easier to see what others chose to share, no where in the world did I ever see anyone with a similar ‘bunkai’ paradigm.

 

But this is what ‘bunkai’ would forever mean to me.

 

My own studies went in different ways. As I understand the term ‘bunkai’, it really was not possible to explain why what others were doing would never be ‘bunkai’ for me. Everyone can use whatever words defined as they wish.

 

I chose to use the term ‘Application Analysis’ for the initial effort involved. Then used the term ‘Application Realization’ for the greater most necessary part of understanding kata applications.

 

I could never, ever, replicate the Sutrisno answer. For I knew to little.

 

So I went my own way.

 

Tuesday, December 18, 2018

My initial discoveries when I began to investigate kata application.


 
 
The later years of the 1980s I really began to work on many things, among them what kata application could mean.

 

I also moved into a new age where we had a video camera at the Club to preserve some of our efforts. So we can see a bit of what we were working on with the youth and adult students of that time too, I was a busy boy.

 

Shodan training  lower body  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkoAfSTH22g

 

After Bushi No Te Summer Camp 1990 – Tris clinic bo and aikido



 

Mike and Andrew Self Defense  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxupUX2zv04

 

1990 standard            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4ocmaD67mM

1990 Nihanchi            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2O8NoAdHkE

1990 Chinto               https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCqHp8THVNI

1990 Kusanku           https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbFbnUBePTo

1990 Sunsu                 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUVjUsaHbGE

Urashie No Bo           https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DinRBnAD64

 

Aikido locking chain 

            Mike               https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ve2IWzT7ktc

            Young             https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zdz-LSmRbWs

 


 

This is much of what I was teaching then, but my personal focus was really all on what kata application could be. And of course I was  working on several tracks at the same time.

 

While I knew something about the Sutrisno approach to bunkai, and was reading what was written, even attending a George Dillman seminar in Manchester NH. I had no guidelines, rules to follow. I was not going to attempt to recreate the Sutrisno model. While I learned much from him, I really was not trained in it extensively. And for me there were literally no rules but what I choose to do.

 

I had done study on what a minimalist system could be, even to the extent that any one technique in and of itself (and any technique) could be a complete system in itself. Not to eliminate Isshinryu, but to gain more understanding about what an application for any technique might me. Below is a post I made on a bit of that potential.

 
One of the things I began to work on

 
Opening of Seisan Kata


 

In turn that study led to other things.

 

A Step Out of the Past


Random notes on Seisan-ness


The fluid movement of kata


 

After the work I had previously done on Kusanku as night fighting applications I turned much of my attention to Seisan kata. Part of what I saw I videoed at base instruction level.

Not what moving toward more advanced execution That would prove to be a later subject to consider. But, one has to start somewhere and this was where I started.

 

Seisan Applications 1990



 

My researches were just that research. I was not at the point I was ready to introduce this as a study in my program. I had no intention that this would ever be kyu study, O’ they might see any of this from time to time, so they could understand what they were studying had a direction. But not a necessary part of what kyu training was about. The earlier videos are much of what the kyu program was about in its own right.

 

Of course my studies incorporated other kata study too. More focused on individual technique of those forms.

 

And of course work and family came first. Then teaching everyone. Last my research and as you can gather it was cooking on many levels.

Monday, December 17, 2018

For every beginning there are a number of first steps


 

 

Back in 1979 I became a black belt in the paradigm that was Tom Lewis’ Isshinryu Karate.


That was a powerful way of Isshinryu. But within a few short months Charles Murray returned to the USAF for a career and I was without an instructor anywhere near me in Isshinryu. I also had no one to train with.

  

Before Charles left, he gave me his collection of old karate magazines, some of them going back to the 1960s.  Always a reader, and with very few resources available to me, I devoured them, and then reread and reread them.

 

I noted several things. Almost every article on a visiting Okinawan Karate Instructor was accompanied by photographs showing ways to use kata techniques against attacks.

 

This was not done in the paradigm of Isshinryu I was taught.


Then there was an article by Fumio Demura on Jiin Kata which had a small sidebar article on Kakushite, which he defined as ‘The Hidden Hand’ of his art and accompanying photos.


 

Those articles began my thinking on how my kata technique might be used. But with no instructor nearby to question, nor partner to work with  I realized I needed to find a different answer.

 

I began teaching youth through the Scranton Boys Club, and I attended tournaments to push myself. At those tournaments I made many friends with the competitors, and discovered there were many different karate schools within driving distance. Then there were invitations to visit and train, and I did.

 

Now I make no claims I was shown everything, nor that I would expect to be, but none of the places I began to train with worked kata applications in my presence. Among them Goju ryu,  Shorin Ryu,  Shotokan,  Wado Ryu and more. The exception was a dojo of Goshin Jutsu. They did not work on kata applications, but trained in some Aiki Jutsu tradition (not a classical one).

 


 
I also began to study Yang Tai Chi with Ernest Rothrock, After a time I realized at tournaments I was called on to judge and some of those competitors were in Chinese styles. I realized I knew nothing of those styles. I then approached Ernest with a question, could I learn some Chinese forms so I could become a more knowledgeable judge. I expect he held back laughing, more because he realized I was really attempting to study Tai Chi. So he turned to a list behind his desk, one listing maybe 500 forms, then asked me which one I wanted to study. Well I was flabbergasted and told him I had no idea what to study. After repeating that a few times, he looked at the list then pointed to a name, telling me perhaps I could begin there.

 

It was a Northern Shaolin form he called ‘Dune De Kuen’. Thus began years of study of forms from a variety of systems. I was not learning the systems, just the forms. And while at times he would point out uses for technique I was not studying applications for those forms, That was not my purpose.

 

While I was training everywhere I could, A large amount of time each week was spent in his schools. Then he began  Saturday afternoon discussions with me. He was asking me questions about my art and about the places I was training. I now recognize he was focusing my mind on my training, through those leading questions. Many of which were about how I would use kata technique. It would be years before I realized the value in those conversations.

 

I also began visiting another competitor, Tristan Sutrisno, and saw many things, some of those drills for his students I later incorporated for my own students more advanced training. They were just drills after all. Some karate, some his Aikido drills, which I much later realized they were incorporating aikido techniques blended with karate and tjimande, to enter an attack in a variety of ways, and end that attack.

 

His students at that time were all kyu’s in his family version of Shitokan. And none of that training was specifically focused on karate applications for kata. Not that drills against attacks were not included, for they were. Later I came to realize his focus on Kyu instructions was just developing skills to later use after Dan for much more advanced training.

 

So I began to think more and more that the study of kata application could be another paradigm for karate, and thought about that more and more. After a long time, still not knowing much one night at a midnight show of a movie “Gorky Park”, it all came together. A methodology about how a kata technique application could be used, ‘The Unlocking Principle’.  Basically it stated that for any movement a block/strike could have a strike following and whichever combination was used resulted in a downing of the opponent (explosive striking, locking or takedown).


I was so moved I immediately called Ernie getting him out of bed, to explain what I worked out. He was then living in Pittsburt and it was 2 am. But all those leading question started my thinking and I had to share it.

 

Now armed with a realization I also had no one to work with, It fit every one of those kata applications in those old articles, I just did not know how to use that knowledge.



 

Privately Tristan began to mention bunkai and defined it, and  explained it was dan training. Layers of dan training for decades of study. I later on realized what he described was the way his father structured training a mature program back in Indonesia.

 

While following some of that template, he did not keep exactly to that approach on his own. I am sure it was to have people to work with for himself. I never got anything close to the whole program, just glimpses. But glimpses that also worked. I would never be a student properly trained, and make no pretentions that was the case.

 

The definition of bunkai that he gave to me, I have never ever found anyone else doing anything remotely the same. As his definition was the first I learned, it was to be the only definition for bunkai I would ever use.  I never would be an adept of the Sutrisno bunkai but it was extremely useful.

 

In its design bunkai for the Sutrisno family art was to be almost a life long dan study, Each level of Dan having completely different bunkai to learn, Explosive techniques, most complex and effective for every kata they studied, Each level of dan requiring a long time to learn and gain skill with, Each layer working an entirely different theme.

 

And the dan haing multitudes of skilled responses on tap, none of them capable of being intuited from their kata performance, and continually changing, new answers coming on line. Continually unreadable. A goal to always consider.

 

While I was not acquiring anything like a complete study, taken together all of them were teaching me how to apply technique.

 

It was at this time Seiryu Oyata hit the magazines, and much was not revealed that manner either.I do not recall that he called what he did as bunkai, but I only have memory to go on. But it started thought.

 

I also have an early handout from Oyata Sensei’s applications of naifanchi seminars, a friend gave me. Nowhere is bunkai as a term mentioned, rather terms like tuite and nerve point manipulation were used. But at the Oyata family’s request I will not share that.

 


 


I remember when George Dillman was bring Oyata in for a clinic, at his tournament he approached Tristan to ask him if he would attend to learn. While I was there with Tristan I was not asked, to low lever a dan to consider.

 

Tristan was not interested, part of the reason that week he had begon to share training he called “Holy Hands’ from his art. Suffice it to say he had enough on his plate. As difficult it is for some to realize.

 


 

Then several years later I believe George broke from Oyata, to do his own version of what Oyata was doing.

 

Around that time the term bunkai began to be used by the magazines, where earlier articles of Okinawan instructors showing kata applications did not use the term.

 

At that time it was in reference to Japanese styles the term began to be used. Then more and more started talking about bunkai. I even recall one article describint how the term traveled from Japan to the States, then Americans returning to Okinawa started asking about bunkai, and the Okinawan instructors in those stories did not understand the question, but soon they began using the term too.

 

Regarding Bunkai (written about 2000) as a term:  A Japanese English teacher and author of English/Japanese dictionaries in Japan (for students) explained to me in Japan most people would not know what you were talking about, as the term is most used in the context of a mechanic would bunkai a car to determine what was wrong. Using bunkai in a very different context. I had to explain the term to him, and while he studied Shorinji Ryu in college, they did not do 'bukai'. He further explained it was a specialized term used by specific karate systems.\

 

Originally Mabuni Sensei shared the concept of bunkai in his first work on Karate in the 1930. When Mabuni expressed the idea of bunkai for his book containing his kata Seiunchin he used the term ‘bunkai’ to mean


Both I and McKenna Sensei have done translations. Mine from a French edition, and his from the Mabuni original. I questioned Mario McKenna Sensei about the use of the term ‘bunkai’ in ‘Goshin Karate Kempo’ and he described it’a use as "breakdown/apart and explanation" from his translation efforts on Mabuni’s book.

 

Then about 1987 of 1988 I began to move to action.

 

I had developed my own adult students, and after almost a decade training with many one night at a class on my driveway during the summer I had an idea where to begin.

 

I decided to select the weakest, most useless appearing technique from a wide variety of  forms and see if I could make them work against an attack, And it turned out I could do so. None of them had I been trained in how to use them.

 

A summer camp I attended and taught at (both Ernest and Tristan would be there). I decided to have some fun. I would teach those few techniques, and give then unique names, creating a little form using them then calling the system I created Smith Te. I even crated a manual for all of it, to give to the people there.


This is what I showed. Smith Te Studies

1. the eagle retreats (da lu)

2. the eagle swoops down (goju saifa)

3. the ghost departs (tenjua ashi ghost techniques)

4. the bear wipes it’s claws (tai chi brush knee)

    The bear wipes it’s nose (tai chi fair lady)

5. the whirling winds (goju/isshinryu mawashi uke)

 

I had fun with it, opening a few eyes who thought I was crazy. But then a 6’6” marine questioned a move. I used him for a demonstration how the whirling winds could stop an attack. And I showed it also contained a snake strike in its movements, which I had mentioned earlier. When he attacked he was quite surprised that I used the whole movement, the snake strike involving placing my fingertips just before his eyes, which totally stopped him, the completing the rest of the movement immobilizing him. I made my point, that my minimalist system worked.

 

Then returning to Derry the next year I went further adding other studies.

 

Smith Te Studies

1. the eagle retreats (da lu)

2. the eagle swoops down (goju saifa)

3. the ghost departs (tenjua ashi ghost techniques)

4. the bear wipes it’s claws (tai chi brush knee)

    The bear wipes it’s nose (tai chi fair lady)

5. the whirling winds (goju/isshinryu mawashi uke)

 

6.  the ascending/descending palm (seisan kata)

7. x-man x-woman – x-shild

8. etude in empi

9. the hammers of doom

10. the breaking arm

11. flower arrangements (based on what were explained to me as Chinese flowers)


I am not going to detail them, Nor did I formally teach them, but did not hide what I was doing from my students either. I definitely began to see a wider picture.

 

At that time I began to focus on my Isshinryu kata. My first choice was Kusanku. The concept that it could prove useful for low level situations, guided my thought. I was not ignoring the movements could be used in any condition, just working up one application possibility.

 

Again I worked up a complete night fighting version of Kusanku kata applications. As useful as this was, it was not part of my students training, though some if slipped in.

 

From Tristan I came to value that Dan was more appropriate a time for bunkai study.

 

That was the beginning of my work that would lead to understand kata application potential then the work to move toward kata application realization. But that is an much longer story.