Allow me to
offer some things my one instructor, Charles Murray, learned on Okinawa back in
1972.
He was a new
black belt under Tom Lewis, and was an airman who was stationed on Okinawa.
While there he trained in Agena at the dojo of Shimabuku Tatsuo as frequently
as possible. There were only several other Americans training there at that
time, because the Marines had their own dojo on their base.Then the majority of
those that trained were Okinawans who came to train on their way home after
work.
I can only
relate this how he explained to me, mainly after reaching my own shodan. He
described how Shinso (Ciso) spent time with him, training him in chinkuchi. But my
time with Charles was too short afterthat to be able to be trained that way myself. And I did not believe I
knew enough to train that way myself.
Basically the
Isshinryu in which I was trained followed a different paradigm, the same one
Charles had been originally trained in.
When his
schedule permitted he spent as much time training at the Agena dojo as
possible.
And when he
described the dojo he included a specific description of a makiwara for
training nukite.
It basically
consisted of 4 walls with a tire innertube (rubber) stretched across it. The
Okinawans training there would strike it with their nukite strikes.
Now one evening
Charles listening to Shinso describing how he would handle an attacker with his
Isshinryu, made claim that his primary weapon would be the nukite. I believe
Charles showed some mis-belief at that, saying something he did not see that to
be an effective answer.
“Almost in reply to my thoughts,
Shinso struck me twice. With his first blow, a nukite (spear-hand thrust), he
temporarily paralyzed my arm; with the second blow, my leg”.
The manner in which he formed the Nukite strike was
different to me. His fingers seemed to be of equal length, allowing them to
strike as a single line of fingers.
He then explained that I needed to change the way I formed
the nukite. As my fingers were longer in the middle, I should bend them so they
appeared the same length. They also should be held open to accommodate this
structure. This would allow them to strike as if a single unit.
It could be
possible that was behind the nukite use you have been describing.
Believe it on
not. Charles trained me and has never give me reason to consider otherwise. I
know he maintained his chinkuchi training over the decades.
Many years later
he found these videos of his training on Okinawa. They are not the best,
butthey are what I have.
Charles in 1972
practicing chinkuchi with his Seisan kata.
Charles in 1972
practicing chinkuchi with his Sunsu kata.
In my years I
worked out different answers. Different time, different place, different
circumstances. I was satisfied with what I did. But that never gave me reason
not to believe what he experienced.
Taiko, a warrior who lived in Japan before the Tokugawa era, studied Cha-no-yu, tea etiquette, with Sen no Rikyu, a teacher of that aesthetical expression of calmness and contentment.
Taiko's attendant warrior Kato interpreted his superior's enthusiasm for tea etiquette as negligence of state affairs, so he decided to kill Sen no Rikyu. He pretended to make a social call upon the tea-master and was invited to drink tea. ...
The master, who was well skilled in his art, saw at a glance the warrior's intention, so he invited Kato to leave his sword outside before entering the room for the ceremony, explaining the Cha-no-yu represents peacefulness itself.
You wouldn't expect a tea-master to offer to clean a sword, since that sounds more like a job for a NYC cleaning service or professional cleaning staff . Such an offer from a teacher to a student should always be accepted graciously.
Kato would not listen to this. "I am a warrior," he said. "I always have my sword with me. Cha-no-yu or no Cha-no-yu, I have my sword."
"Very well. Bring your sword in and have some tea," consented Sen no Rikyu.
The kettle was boiling on the charcoal fire. Suddenly Sen no Rikyu tipped it over. Hissing steam arose, filling the room with smoke and ashes. The startled warrior ran outside.
The tea-master apologized. "It was my mistake. Come back in and have some tea. I have your sword here covered with ashes and will clean it and give it to you."
In this predicament the warrior realized he could not very well kill the tea-master, so he gave up the idea.
Now I trained
with more than a few people acquiring a great deal about how a variety of
systems applied the techniques of their forms. Then I began my own analysis of
what kata technique might be. Meeting Sherman Harrill was a real eye opener,
experiencing what he worked out over his decades. But the more important lesson
was how he worked out the underlying principles and then could use those over
and over to work out different answers for different kata techniques.
Several years
after his passing what I found more important were the principles Sherman
revealed, and how that would influence me going forward. I never saw everything
he worked out.
Then one day,
when I was working out so many different answers I decided to work on another
technique series on my own. A use for the section of
Chinto kata that contains the spin.
I had seen
various answers from other Okinawan schools, but they did not satisfy me.
I began looking at
the Principles I held regarding Chinto kata, and related knowledge.
1.One principle I
held was that one of the secrets of Chinto kata were the ability to use the
turns from the kata as a complete weapon system in their own right. The spin of
Chinto fit that to a T.
2.From my tai chi
instructor I learned a great deal how the correct body alignment in a technique
could increase the power and usage of the technique. That proved to be critical
to understand how to make the most of the movement used.
3.Use could be
made for the full utilization of the kata section under consideration.
4.This was nothing
close to the whole answer, just an effective one in its own right.
Start
with someone grabbing toward your back, or grabbing your collar from the year.
You
are facing the front and first you step into a horse stance to the side,
frustrating their grab attempt, As you do that you simultaneously form a left
high block and a right low block. The purpose it to deflect their grabbing arm
away from you, the nature of the simultaneous Ho/Low block is to better align
your body to increase the power of that right parry block.
Then
your left leg places your foot behind your right knee and you spin counter-clockwise
on the right leg. This is done in increase the momentum of the spin with the
left leg moving into your centerline. At the same time the right hand chambers
with a slashing right fist across the right ribs on the side of their body. Also
at the same time the left hand crosses in front of the face to high chamber
along slid the left side of the face. These 3 movements, left foot behind the
knee, right hand slashing back to chamber and left hand moving along side the
face, all better align the body to increase the speed of the turn. The strike
to the ribs also makes the opponents mind shift to the area being struck,
weakening their ability to respond.
As the
spin concludes that left leg comes out ( slides out, slices out) to place your
left foot cutting forward behind their knee (no matter whether their right knee
or their left knee). This causes them to drop.
The
conclusion of your spin uses their knee to force them to fall. Finished with
your spin the left foot steps down on their bent and downed leg (or more
correctly on their calf) and at the conclusion you perform a downward strike
into the downed opponent.
It is wordy but
descriptive of what I found.
Of course this
is just one option. But it works for me.
The
first set of photos are of Young Lee performing Chinto back in 1990. Closer to
the version described in this application analysis.
The
second set of photos are also of Young Lee performing Chinto with a bit of
different focus on his mind. It is important to realize that there are
variations of performance each having slightly different application potential.
IMO this is not a consideration of right or wrong, just as aspect of different
focus on what you are using the form for. It does not preclude using
application potential from either version as the situation offers.
That
gets into the larger purpose of kata application study to move toward the day
when you can fit any technique into the space of any attack and conclude that
attack. No form, no specific function, Just potentially using any it as you
chose.
I am far from an expert on what Sherman Harrill knew, but in our brief time
together I recorded 800 applications for the Isshinryu kata, only a portion of what
he did.
One time at a Clinic with Sherman Harrill he did this technique.
Seiunchin Kata – Break Bear Hug from the Rear
Though this was quite a few years ago I remember this as if it was
yesterday.
The key is how he used the movements of this section to touch to top of
the grabbing arms and lead the opponents mind away from their grasping
movement, allowing the elbow strike to be more effective.
Seiunchin Kata – Break Bear Hug from the Rear
1.Attacker grabs from rear in Bear Hug
a.First attack their left elbow, then roll
into the defense
b.Your left arm raises the attackers elbow to
the side
c.RFB into cat stance between their legs
d.Roll into Right Rear Elbow Strike with a
left forward elbow strike
By breaking their focus, raising their arm
to the side you create an opening for the rolling strikes.
Refer to the principles, here various
touches can be used to lead the mind, making the escape easier.
There are vast
differences between how martial knowledge such as learning kata occurs.
Let me give a
few examples from what I have experienced.
1, There is
continual instruction from one’s instructors (best when it occurs over decades)
involving continual adjustments to one’s kata as one’s ability changes. This
also occurs with a few years initial instruction the thereafter continually
learning in the role of being an instructor.
2. When friends
share forms, and then make adjustments as well as observing their students
progress on those forms over the years.
3. When you are
able to learn forms very quickly, you really only have your impression what the
form really is. That can be useful with work, but it is never really the
original either. Your own work on that form over the decades make you find your
own worth to the study. But in no case is it the original.
4. When you are
able to learn forms very quickly, you really only have your impression of what
the form really is. But with work that can prove useful as for attacks to work
against.
This is not a
complete survey of what can happen, just useful.
For without
constant continual instruction you can not say you really got the form.
Once upon a time
I used to attend a Summer Camp for a variety of martial training for a decade.
I learnt many things, and likely did not learn as many too.
At that first
summer camp, Tristan Sutrisno decided to instruct the black belts there in a
form of his Nijushiho. He really did not explain the form so much, just taught
it. And me being me, Iremembered what
was shown.
Then I began to
practice the form..Several years later, no longer competing, I thought it would
be interesting once again to compete, and to do so with the Nijushiho I had
learned.
Never asked
Tristan, just did it. That was what it was, Came, Did then Done.
Then I moved to
Derry and in a while began my youth and adult programs. Tristan used to come up
and put on clinics for my students, but mostly for me, because He knew I would
retain what was shown. The material was not really used for my student’s
studies. Perhaps some of it at a later date.
Then around 1989
I decided to include a subsidiary kata for my students, to honor Tristan’s
contributions to m art. When he was visiting, to also compete for fun at a
local karate tournament, I told him of my idea, thinking the kata would be
Bassai Dai.
Instead Tristan
suggested Nijushiho and then taught it to them at a clinic, including his
bunkai for the form. Because I ‘knew’ the form, I spent my time assisting
everyone to learn the form. I also did not pay a great deal of attention to
what was being taught. I did use the club’s new video camera to record it
(later glancing at the tapes once, then setting it aside as I ‘knew’ the form.
The next week
when the adults practiced, I saw there were mistakes made in their form, and as
I ‘knew’ the form I corrected them to what I had been shown.
That remained
the way the next 20 years we did the form, Over the years Tristan and I went
our separate ways, for a variety of reasons, but he had contributed greatly to
my knowledge and I always wanted my students to share in that experience a bit.
Then about 20
years later I finally watched those tapes, discovering that the version he
showed my students, and that which they initially did, was not the version I
was originally shown. Close but not the same thing. And because I ’knew’ the
form I did not look at what was actually happening that day they were shown the
form.
I am not an
adept in his art, I just know that I was shown, But from that knowledge I can
guess what happened.
When I was first
shown the form, I believeas he thought
no one would remember, he shareda more
advanced variant version of Nijushiho. Call it Nijushiho(2). And what he showed my students was version Nijushiho(1).
In his system after black belt, when the study of his
bunkai begins, when you acquire the bunkai you are also shown a variant version
of the kata, A variant to help you remember those bunkai, not bunkai as the
term has come to be used.
Rather each movement point of the form as a unique set of applications to
be learned. The variant version of the form to be a mnemonic to remember them
Then as dan
study increased, at Ni Dan different bunkai were studied for each form, and a
new variant version of the form would be learned for the same reason. Thus a
Nijushiho(3) etc for all 5 dan levels in his system. Encompassing a very large
study of extremely effective technique.
At that time I
was generally aware of this, but had not pieced this together.
When I realized
what was reality, I suggested to the other instructors that they might want to
return to the version they were originally taught.
Perhaps you
would say, it really doesn’t matter, as they are just subsidiary studies. And
perhaps it does notAs most students
never really get that far, and those that do most likely (the adults) go much further
into dan studies.
But is a
caution about what you really know when you do not spend years with an
instructor (which becomes something unique in itself).
Now the rest of
the story.
The two versions
shown of Nijushiho in the Sutrisno system would be NIjushiho(1) amd (2).
The version
Nijushiho(2) is not shown. The differences are slight, more useful as a
mnemonic to retain the ‘bunkai’ of that system.
Additionally in the Sutrisno
family Shotokan, there are 3 Gojushiho kata. Gojushiho,, Gojushiho Dai and
Gojushiho Sho. The later 2 versions are what is more commonly associated with
Shotokan. He teaches his students all of the versions, each with separate
‘bunkai’.
What can be
discerned is a bit of what I am talking about. The Sutrisno version is a bit
different than my studentYoung Lee’s Gojushiho version. Even after decades of work,work reinforces by many studies of that system, it shows an Isshinryu
cast to the performance. Because we were not really his students.
The point being
when learning a form just from a clinic. You are less likely to get ‘it’ and
more likely to make what you have your own version. Not that is bad, just
reality.
As this was a
subsidiary study, knowledge of the ‘bunkai’ we were shown was not a practice we
focused on. The application potential and application realization of Isshinry
was always our focus.
But being a
subsidiary form, does not mean we did not put intense practice on it.
When Bankei held his seclusion-weeks of meditation, pupils from many parts of Japan came to attend. During one of these gatherings a pupil was caught stealing. The matter was reported to Bankei with the request that the culprit be expelled. Bankei ignored the case.
Later the pupil was caught in a similar act, and again Bankei disregarded the matter. this angered the other pupils, who drew up a petition asking for the dismissal of the thief, stating that otherwise they would leave in a body.
When Bankei had read the petition he called everyone before him.
"You are wise brothers," he told them. "You know what is right and what is not right. You may somewhere else to study if you wish, but this poor brother does not even know right from wrong. Who will teach him if I do not? I am going to keep him here even if all the rest of you leave."
A torrent of tears cleansed the face of the brother who had stolen. All desire to steal had vanished.