Tuesday, January 23, 2024

History of Karate by Miyagi Kei

 

 

A rare photo of Kei Miyagi sensei (Chojun Miyagi's oldest son) applying the arm break from Kururunfa Kata. 

Unfortunately, Kei kind of got lost in the Goju-Ryu history. He was a direct and senior student of his father, and opened the Komeikan dojo in mainland Japan.


Excerpted from How to enjoy Karate-do (1965), pg. 14 – 17


Karate is an ancient form of budo developed in our country, Okinawa.  Karate is a martial sport which does not use weapons, uses the mind and body, and the empty hands and fists to defend against an opponent.  In other words, realistically and logically, karate provides an orderly training method as a martial art, as sport, and as physical education.  Moreover, karate is organized in a scientific manner as a means of psychology cultivation, and technically as a method of attack and defense.  Therefore, karate quickly makes a powerful body, teaches etiquette and promotes an attitude necessary for harmonious social life.


Karate may have originated from a combination of indigenous grappling techniques and Chinese kenpo which was transmitted by trade with China.  Approximately 500 years ago, and then again, 350 years ago, there were three government edicts banning weapons in Okinawa.  This laid the foundation for the development of a unique Okinawan karate.  


The first ban occurred during the “Three Mountain Unification Age” under the Sho ancestor Shohashi in 1429.  During this time Okinawa was divided into three rival kingdoms Chuzan, Nanzan and Hokuzan.  The king of Chuzan, Shohashi, united all three kingdoms, placed them under his control and issued a severe policy banning weapons. 


The second time occurred under the third Sho king, Shoshin in 1477.  Shoshin wished to centralize his government and issued an edict disarming the anji (on Okinawa, anji referred to a feudal lord). 


The third time was over 200 years ago in 1609 when the Shimazu entered Okinawa.  Since then, the possession of arms has been prohibited completely.


When was karate transmitted from China and how did it develop? This depends on one’s thinking, but karate does not have any specific historical documentation so there is no way to know.


We can think of modern karate as the product of the two weapons ban and the entry of the Shimazu into Okinawa in conjunction with the introduction of Chinese style kenpo from Fuzhou through trade with China, and the inclusion of traditional grappling skills.  This was trained and studied by the Ryukyu shizoku in secret during the age of the weapons ban.


On Okinawa, Karate is referred to as “te” (te = Okinawa te) or “toude”.  In other words, “te” (Okinawa te) refers to something that is uniquely Okinawan in tradition.  “Toude” includes the meaning that it is related to Chinese kenpo.  For instance, the use of the fist on Amami Oshima is similar to that of the Japanese mainland.  That is, the stance and use of the fist are different from the way of gripping and applying the fist in Okinawa karate. 


I think this is one piece of evidence showing the peculiar development and spread of Okinawan karate technique by the Shimazu to Amami Oshima.


The word “te” was chiefly used on Okinawa and was incorporated into two main styles, “Shurite” and “Nahate”.  These two names are the source of two large systems of karate.  One is called “Toude" which I touched on previously and is thought to mean it is related to Chinese kenpo.  


On Okinawa, things Chinese were held in high regard and anything good was referred to as “to” (i.e. Tang) .  It was a trend of people during this era to think of something which had value as a “Tang object”.  Therefore the character for “to” (Tang)as found in “toude” seems to have become "toude".  Also at some point and unbeknownst, “tou” can also be read “kara” giving us “karate”.  When I was a child, fine antiques and Chinaware, etc. were loosely referred to as “Tang objects”.  


Originally on Okinawa when someone wanted to learn karate, they would request by saying, “please teach me “te”.  The characters "karate" had already been used in the of the first Okinawa prefectural junior high school karate club’s since about August 1905. 


At the end of 1921, Funakoshi Gichin was invited from Okinawa to the physical education exhibition sponsored by the Ministry of Education.  The exhibit was held at Ochanomizu Women’s Teacher College and included demonstrations of Kobudo (classical martial ways).  This was the first time that karate was demonstrated in the capital.


In the beginning of the Showa era, Keio University created the “Toude Study Group”.  This was the first time that the characters for “karate” were put into general use when the group first used the term “Dai Nippon Kenpo Karate-do”.  From 1921 to 1936, Funakoshi Gichin contributed to the spread of the Karate in Tokyo.  Through his efforts, he opened the first karate dojo, the shotokan, in Zakagatani, Toyoshima ward.  Motobu Choki followed next and came to Osaka where he introduced karate in 1924. 


My father(Goju-ryu Karate-do founder Miyagi Chojun) introduced goju-ryu karate in a grand ceremony in Kyoto for the first time in 1928.  In that same year he was invited to give demonstrations and lectures to Kyoto Imperial University’s Judo Club.  Through the brilliance of these grand ceremonies, goju-ryu karate-do took root in the ground of old Kyoto for the first time that year.   Later, shifu  worked to promote and unify karate through the country.  His first step was gaining recognition as part of Nihon Budo.  He devoted all his energies to receive authorization from this association.  


In November, 1933, karatedo was promoted by the  Dai Nippon Butokukai Okinawa Branch.  In addition karatedo was authorized as a martial art of Japan and listed as a Japanese budo by the Dai Nippon Butokukai and began to be promoted and developed throughout the country both nominally and realistically for the first time.  This was a special recognition in history as the local martial art of Okinawa karate was now recognized for its value the field of Japanese budo and physical education.  


With the dissolution of the Dai Nippon Butokukai and the defeat of our country, it is extremely regrettable loss for budo and karatedo that after coming to Kyoto, shifu could not achieve his great ambition of spreading karatedo throughout Japan and the world.   


In 1929 Shitoryu founder Mabuni Kenwa was able to come to Osaka, where he resided and contributed to the spread and development of karatedo.



In May 1937 shifu, Shindojizen-ryu founder Konishi Yosuke  and Kushin-ryu founder Ueshima Sanosuke, received the first karate-jutsu titles of Kyoushi from the president of the Dai Nippon Butokukai, his highness Prince Nashimoto Moriwasa.  Until the dissolution of the Dai Nippon Butokukai, it contributed to the spread and development of karate-jutsu through the licensing of instructors.  Konishi is presently active in Tokyo and Ueshima in Kansai.


As touched on previously,  karatedo is divided into two main systems, Shurite and Nahate since olden times.   Why is the unique Okinawan martial art of karate not divided into different styles or groups like kenjutsu, jujutsu and other kobujutsu?  Perhaps it is because of the custom of instruction and training being conducted secretly due to a deep-rooted reserve has remained resulting from the influence of the weapons ban edicts and the entry of the Shimazu clan.  


At the end at the Meiji era the karate masters of that time, Nahate’s Higashionna Kanryo and Shurite’s Itosu Anko, who introduced karate to the public, did not name their style or system.  However, karatedo came to be taught at Shuri elementary school as part of it’s curriculum in April, 1901.  Moreover, Funakoshi traveled to Tokyo to advance karate and shifu worked towards receiving recognition of karate as a martial art by the Dai Nippon Butokukai allowing karate to receive more attention than other kobujutsu. 


Furthermore, shifu studied the kata and kumite of the Nahate group in a scientific manner, which had been taught to him by Nahate’s Higashionna Kanryo.


In traditional karate it was said that “one fist must kill without fail”.  This is because karate was developed entirely as a technique to injure or kill someone in actual combat.  However, from today's educational viewpoint this kind of technique, training and practice method is improper.


 Besides the basic kata sanchin, there is the soft kata tensho created from researching rokkishu.  However, before beginning the basic kata and advanced kata (kaishugata) of karate, preliminary empty hand exercises related to karate technique are performed along with supplementary exercises to train a flexible, but strong physical strength improving karate technique.


The old methods of karate instruction provided both realistically and theoretically the order and method of training.  These were organized scientifically as a method of sport, physical training and mental training, and introduced for the first time in karate as goju-ryu.  The name goju-ryu was taken from two characters from the phrase “Ho wa goju wo dontosu” from the “Kenpo Haku ”.


Later on in the karate world, shifu’s young apprentice Mabuni Kenwa corresponded with him and took the first characters of both Higashionna and Itosu to name his shito-ryu.  Funakoshi Gichin’s students took the name of his dojo, Shotokan, to name his style Shotokan-ryu.  Each karate style began to be respectively named such as Konishi Yosuke’s Shindojizen-ryu, Ueshima Sannosuke’s Kushin-ryu and Otsuka Hironori’s Wado-ryu, contributing more and more to the development of karate-do and it’s prosperity today. 


Finally, anyone at first glance can see there is a remarkable difference between both styles.  In the basic kata, goju-ryu uses sanchin and tensho which uses breathing method the  “tonto ”(regulation of vital energy and breath).  The most noticeable technical difference is the position of the fist while punching.  In shurite the fist is positioned by the waist or belt line, whereas gojuryu always places the fist by the breast. 


  In Japanese, “Sangoku Touichi Jidan

  A reference to the Tang Dynasty in China.

  Miyagi refers to his father, Miyagi Chojun, as “shifu” which literally means “teaching father”.

  Miyagi uses the name Yosuke which I believe is a mistake.  Konishi’s first name was Yasuhiro.

  “Ikken hissatsu” in Japanese.

  “The eight teachings of the fist

  Literally “swallow and spit”.


Translated by Mario McKenna ©2002.


Monday, January 22, 2024

Karate-do Taiken by Genwa Kakasone from 1938





An incredible book worth reading.

 Isshin - Concentration the Art: Karate-do Taiken by Genwa Nakasone (1938):


Joe Swift acquired a reprint of the original. it is in Japanese but I can view the photos quite well. Mario McKenna had transferred the book into English and it really is worth the price, it is sold on Lulu publications.

A review by Andreas  Quanst 

Karate-do Taikan – 2017 reissue by Gajumaru Shoten | Ryukyu Bugei 琉球武芸 (ryukyu-bugei.com) 


Sanchin, It is not where you begin, it is where you finish that matters.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqLpatzpwjk



I was a brown belt I remember Charles Murray (who was then training me) telling me "Your first 20 years your karate is your instructor(s). But after 20 years your karate is yours."


Now aged and much disabled (something many will face) my Sanchin practice remains. I do what I can, that is all anyone can do. This is part of my journey.


It was 1987 when I was taught Sanchin kata by Charles Murray. Since I began studying with him, he had taught me Kusanku, Tokumeni No Kon, Kusanku Sai and Sunsu prior to that. He taught at a very fast pace, no likely to have someone else to practice with.


I remember removing my Gi top when I performed Sanchin for my black belt test.


Then in an instant I was on my own, Charles returned to the USAF to resume his career in the US Airforce. I had no local instructor in Isshinryu and I had to direct my own training. When possible, I made long drives to train with Tom Lewis, and regularly also trained with Reese Rigby, but never was Sanchin training part of what I underwent with the two of them.


I began to study Yang Tai Chi Chaun with Ernest Rothrock, quickly I felt a huge difference between working on Sanchin and Tai Chi.


What I experienced was a conflict between the different energy flows between the two very different forms. Having on one to discuss this with and really wanting to learn the Yang form, after much reflection I discontinued hard Sanchin practice and just performed the kata lightly. While I trained with many, none of those places performed Sanchin, thus I had no one to ask.


After 2 years I had learned the entire Yang form (And that too would require a lifetime of further work). Yet at that time I discovered I could differentiate between both styles of training and resumed hard Snachin training for myself. I was able to keep those two practices separate for me.


In 1985 I moved to New Hampshire, one of the instructors I regularly trained with, Tristan Sutrisno, began to make regular trips to see me, train me and give clinics on aspects of his vast art to my students. One visit in 1988 he brought a group of his students to train there too. In all it was a fun weekend. That Saturday he decided to test me according to his associations standards. Once that was finished, we began a long bull session on various martial issues.


In time we got around to Sanchin kata (which was not part of his systems training). But Tris had a great deal of experience with many people. He explained that for him Sanchin was not for fighting, instead he felt its only purpose was for strength development. Having trained with quite a few myself, I explained to me the only purpose of Sanchin kata was another way to drop an opponent. Tris took exception to my thought insisting he was correct. Then we went back and forth with our discussion. Eventually we turned to other matters.


However, my opinion stayed with me. I lingered on that concept.


That was about the time I began my own study of what Isshinryu kata could do against many attacks. The study did not begin step by step with one kata. Rather I shot gunned over many kata techniques discovering ways they could be used. Eventually I worked out how Sanchin could be used by me.


What follows is a brief paper I wrote on those experiences,


*******************************************************

Sanchin Revisited - Energy Rising and Falling

The further I explore the marvelous energies utilized in my Sanchin kata practice the more I remain convinced Sanchin (concentrating on my Bushi No Te Isshinryu version) is an incredible answer for complete self-defense.

No matter what attack springs out at us Sanchin forms a correct response.

Step forward with the left foot in a crescent step forming a left Sanchin stance, and at the same time bring both arms up in from of the chest in front rotating the forearms outward into a double "blocking" position.

Most attacks, grabs, strikes, multiple strikes are coming into your body and/or arms.

Utilization of Sanchin stepping draws your energy of movement into your centerline and allows you to explode outward and forward from there.   Your interception of their attack will be before they have reached the full focus of their technique.

Most of the time we are standing with our arms hanging down. Sanchin allows us to move into the attack and use the rising motion of the arm, without chambering, to drive into the opponent and attack simultaneously. And at the same time, you're striking upward from below, with two rising and turning arms and fists.

People are more likely to harden themselves to take a strike when they perceive it coming straight into their body.

But Sanchin is moving into their attack and stirring with a rising motion. Where they're focusing on getting to you, instead you're striking into them from a direction they're not following.

One arm might be simultaneously striking into a leg or arm or chest with a rising rotating strike, either with the fist, or the forearm. This can wedge the attack outward.  The other strike can be into the ribs, or the solar plexus, or the jaw.

Furthermore, both the act of stepping into the attack with Sanchin stepping, further torso rotation from knee rotation and dropping your center as you strike upward, allows maximum energy transfer.

It really is a marvelous use of energy, very akin to Chinto's rising "X" strike on the kata's opening. or steeping into the t'ai chi world, the step up to the seven start (borrowing Cheng Man-Ch'ing's answer from "Advanced T'ai Chi Form Instruction".

IMVHO, the crucial element is the rising energy driving into the opponents' limbs and/or body.

In and of itself, this use of  Sanchin should be sufficient to shake most attackers.

Yet, if that hasn't proven enough the chambering right hand that follows allows even a more damaging response, that of the slashing chambering hand.

Those strikes can be most punishing. Again, the chambering hand retracts and slashed on ankles the attacker isn't expecting to receive. The back of the hand's knuckles, or even he little knuckle itself, which can slash across the neck, sides of the chest or an open limb with great response.

That there can still be a following reverse strike i almost unnecessary.

The manner of stepping alone can also be used to immobilize the attackers lead foot by stepping on it or by hooking the foot being their lead foot to then become a shin press only increases the force being generated by the arms and the hands.

Full utilization of Sanchin is the goal.  

#######################################################


Then over the subsequent decades I realized more and more, of course what I described is often enough to conclude any attack,


About 25 years into my own study, where I was also working on the Uechi Sanchin kata (whichTom Chan had taught me), I realized more. The faster performed Uechi version offered what I found as a cleaner energy release of Sanchin energy. That an I came to see more value in using the vertical strike with the edge of my knuckles to strike with. I also felt the Ueichi use of Natural Breathing (not forced breathing as I had originally been taught) also allowed a more natural release for energy into the attacker.


While I never ceased having my students perform Sanchin the manner in which I was taught, for myself I took a new direction. 'I began to work a softer, faster Sanchin kata with vertical strikes. For myself I found a better way to destroy all attacks by using my Sanchin kata.'

Of course, ageing, surgeries and developing several disabilities made a difference in my art. In 2014 when Charles visited me in Derry, I performed my Sanchin alongside his Sanchin, showing my differences.

I also gave him control of my students Sanchin, for my efforts were just that mine alone.

Then my disabilities increased, among them lack of balance, general weakness even to affect my speech.  I still practiced kata but much slower.  Much, much shower.

The only one that remains close to how I was taught is my Sanchin kata. I practice my original version, the Uechi version and my own version. 

I still have Sanchin, leaving me my Isshinryu.

It is not where you begin, 

it is where you finish those matters.


#######################################################


My students with Charles Murray, They are performing the Sanchin I always taught them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knjojRTbVm8


Charles and I performing our Sanchin kata, Mine is what I developed as my personal understanding of what Sanchin could be. (This was only for my own practice.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXAxUg169-o



 



Sherman Harrill 1999 explaining the use of some Naifanchi kata footwork

 

The first time I met Sherman Harrill was at a clinic Garry Gerrosie hosted. Of course, what Sherman showed was most incredible. After several hours the mind grazed over as he kept going and going.

That mind glaze continued after lunch, then he showed this potential use for Naifanchi kata footwork. My mind woke up, I was quite astonished at what he was showing.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-e-0ey43re0





Saturday, January 20, 2024

One time long ago when the concept of BUNKAI was being discussed on the Cyberdojo discussion group

 


There were so many items I learned only through my own research. It never was the intent from my instructors to ever teach them during class time, nor did any of the other instructors I trained with throughout the Northeast USA ever mention them either.



Such as I knew there were other styles, but no idea what they were like. Only saw them at many tournaments and then only a small slice about what their training was like. Nor was I aware how different Okinawan karate was compared to Japanese karate. Even to the extent each developed a very different vocabulary to teach their systems.



Then it is no different for me for I only ever had time to work on my own students Isshinryu even when working them for decades.



When I began my Isshinryu studies in the mid 1970s I never heard of bunkai (meaning the application of kata technique). In fact it was in 1983 once during a visit with Tristan Sustrisno in his dojo he had just explained what his family art of Shotokan called bunkai. Explaining those studies began at ShoDan and continued for life thereafter. He began to demonstrate what some of them were. (Of course, what I later discovered his family BUNKAI was extremely different from how anyone else in the world would explain the term. And his definition is how I would ever after be the one that I choose to accept.)



The next weekend he and I were at a Dillman tournament in Redding PA. George rushed over seeing Tristan to invite him to attend a clinic he was presenting for Oyata Sensei where bunkai was to be shown.    Dillman was at that time doing some training with Oyata.   Tristan declined turning towards me with a smirk as he had just been sharing what bunkai was to me. Those were the first two times I had ever heard of the word.



From that time the use of the word 'Bunkai' exploded, many began using the word, as the magazines started pushing it.



When we entered the internet age, it promoted many times many discussions. One of them was on the Cyber Dojo on Yahoo Groups. It was about some of the ways bunkai was being presented and how some never heard of the term during their own training on Okinawa. That was the point where Dan Smith, of the Seibukan, entered the discussion. Here were his comments which I saved.




LETTER 1.  - Kata & bunkai 


  In response to some of the post on bogus bunkai and some Okinawan instructors and dojo not having bunkai that seem to be anything   but block/punch.



  I would agree that there are dojo on Okinawa that fall into the above category. Please remember that we are discussing human beings, and the frailties and shortcomings are the same whether you live in Okinawa, Japan or the USA. I believe that Goshiki (sp) is right in   relating other's observations to him that their is a lack of bunkai understanding in Okinawa. But there is some very good reasons   behind the lack of the focus on bunkai training.



  I believe the most important factor was the dissemination of karate to Japan. The entire method of training was changed to cater to the   teaching karate as physical exercise in the public schools. The next factor was the rapid development of karate styles in Japan. It is hard to imagine that from 1922 to 1937 there was no less than a dozen different styles developed by Japanese on the mainland. So, in   15 years you had this many people move up to the   position of leading their own school. 



Why there are countless of us in the USA and Okinawa that have been with the same teachers for thirty years and if we started our own group we would be soundly criticized. How did this effect the bunkai of the kata? They did not stay with the Okinawans long enough to learn and the karate that was taught in the beginning was kihon only. 



The Japanese had a strong desire to use what they were learning, and they developed the jiyu kumite as a supplement for not knowing the bunkai. The sparring matches became their method of measuring their karate skills whereas the Okinawans had only used the measurement of being able to defend   themselves and live long lives.



  The Okinawans became victim to this same thought process after the war. Why? Because only a handful of the older teachers were left and many of the teachers who began teaching after the war were trained in school karate where   the emphasis was on body and spirit development. The method of training on Okinawa followed the Japanese for many years with the emphasis on bogu jiyu kumite. The training methods were changed or adapted in many dojo to improve the ability to free spar vs. actual combat.



  I am not saying that all Okinawan schools followed this way but many of them did. I believe most of all the senior teachers had the   knowledge of what karate had been but due to the changing times they designed their instruction   to meet the perceived needs of the day.



  I have observed over the last nine years in Okinawa a resurgence of traditional Okinawan karate. A symposium was held in August of   1990 after the Uchinanchu demonstrations to establish the direction of Okinawan karate. I was fortunate to attend this symposium and   witnessed the senior teachers calling for a return to traditional Okinawan karate and kobudo. Since that time much effort and expense has been expended to but the emphasis on re-establishing Okinawan karate as it should be. I have been to Okinawa 14 times in the last nine years and have seen a dramatic change on the emphasis being placed on training methods.



  In the late 60's when I lived on Okinawa more emphasis was put on kihon, kata and jiyu kumite. One of the reasons was that is what   Americans liked and enjoyed. Many of the Okinawan teachers made their livings teaching servicemen. Most of these men were only on   Okinawa for 18 months so the training was geared to having them experience the Okinawan karate and enjoy their time on Okinawa.   




Yes, I know that most of the servicemen who were there on Okinawa during this time will say that they learned more than just kihon, kata and jiyu kumite and perhaps some did but those that will be honest with themselves should answer just as the Japanese should have from what they learned from the Okinawans and that is they did not even hear the word bunkai from the Okinawans. The word  bunkai is not even Unchinanguchi. The Okinawans that I trained with used the term ti chi ki, which I was told meant showing what the hand is doing.



  I have rambled on enough about all of this so please forgive me. The point is that the Okinawans knew and still know the bunkai of the   kata. They were just emphasizing something different.



  I have an acquaintance that I have known for about thirty years. He is an 8th dan now and several years ago I had the opportunity to   train in his dojo frequently over a period of a year while on business trips. He would ask me questions concerning bunkai of kata and I   would give him answers thinking all along that he was just pulling my leg when he would say he had never seen the explanations of the   kata like that. He asked me how I got this information. I told him that my teacher's father would show me during our morning classes. After a couple of months had gone by, he said he thought that I must be making these applications up. He said they made sense, but he knew that if his sensei (different than mine and very highly thought of on Okinawa) knew these applications he would have taught him. 



Sometime after this he and I went to Okinawa together and he asked his teacher in front of me some kata bunkai   questions. His teacher readily gave him similar answers that I had provided even though we are from a different school. He said why haven't you taught me this before? The reply was that you never asked me, and I thought you were satisfied with what you were   getting. 


I believe the point to this story is that the Okinawans were giving the Japanese and Americans what they thought they wanted.   Surely this must have been easy to think because neither the Japanese or Americans ever went back to Okinawa for much training   after their initial introduction to Okinawan karate. How many Japanese that created these various schools ever went to Okinawa and   trained for any length of time?



  What do most of the students who come into your dojo want? What are you giving them? How many times as we as teacher wanted our students to want more and we were willing to give it to them, but they demonstrated by their actions that they were satisfied with kick/punch.



  I will close for now and hope that I have not dragged this out to much. One thing I did not discuss was the thought put forth by some   that there are no blocks in karate bunkai. I would like to discuss this at a later date if anyone has an interest.



  Thanks for reading all of this if you did and I apologize if I took too much bandwidth.



  Oh, a question for the members who attended the Okinawan Rengokai seminars.   Did you see any bunkai applications of the kata?


  Gumbatte



LETTER 2. - Kata & bunkai 



  I certainly did not mean in my post to give the indication that all Okinawan schools did not continue to practice bunkai as an integral part of their training. I wrote that there are schools in Okinawa just as any other place in the world that do not have the full curriculum   that other schools have. I certainly would not mention those that I think do or don't. I know Iha sensei's background as well as his teachers are and were well grounded on bunkai of the kata.



  My comment was one of a general nature only depicting that there are bogus people all over the world. No one country or race has a   monopoly on ignorance or charlatanism. It just appears that the USA has more than our fair share.



  Concerning the Japanese not understanding the bunkai from the Okinawans. I think I can fairly state that bunkai from the Okinawans   perception was not part of their curriculum. They took the parts of the Okinawan karate that they wanted for their purposes and   developed that part to a high degree. You cannot deny that the gymnastic, athletic movements of the Japanese styles is not better   developed than the Okinawans.



  Someone mentioned in a post yesterday that the way the Japanese had changed karate or taken the Okinawans "school" karate and   spread it worldwide and would we rather have karate spread out for everyone to enjoy or have kept it like the Okinawans developed it.   My response is that I would rather have the "school" karate spread throughout the world if that is what it takes to build the karate-do spirit and body for so many people to have gotten benefit from. 



Perhaps Itosu sensei knew that the real Okinawan karate was just for the few and school karate was for the populace. 



I am teaching school karate to all of the young people that come into my schools with hopes that they will develop the body they need to grow to an adult and then began learning karate. I hopefully will retire from my business career in a couple of more years and then I would like to teach in the middle and high schools along with the colleges in my area. I have been thinking for some time what I would teach given the opportunity to teach hundreds of people in that environment. I keep coming up with the same concept that Itosu used.



  Modern karate as developed by the Japanese with a kick start from Itosu and Funakoshi is for the masses and there has been and continues to be a great benefit from this training. The traditional Okinawan karate is not for the masses, and it was never intended to be that way.



  I had the opportunity when I lived on Okinawa to train in both methods at the same time and in the same school. I trained in the   morning with Zenryo Shimabukuro sensei and at night with Zenpo Shimabukuro sensei. The morning class was dramatically different.  Zenryo sensei never had us line up to begin a class. The people who attended this morning class came at various times. Began training on their own in whatever part of the dojo they could find to practice by themselves. 



Zenryo sensei would observe us practicing kata, give corrections, instructions on how to perform the movements and demonstrate to us individually what the kata movements where. The nighttime training was heavily geared toward kihon practice, kata and sparring. We did weight training and ippon kumites, which were extracted bunkai movements from the kata, and we ran. The training was geared to developing the body and the tools of karate. After training at night many seniors would stay late and practice the kata bunkai that Zenryo sensei was teaching in the morning.



  I share the above with you about my own training to show you how someone could have come only to the night training and developed only the kihon because they were training in large group classes. They did not make themselves available for the in-depth training. This   happens in our classes today all over the world. Just as I mentioned yesterday the people get what they want from the training. The   teacher may have much more to give but the student is satisfied with less. Sometimes because that is all they want or do not realize there is more.



  I hope that this clarifies that on Okinawa there is much to learn and you have to put the time in to enable the learning process. Many   Japanese and Americans stopped short due to time constraints and being satisfied with what they had so they did not learn the in-depth meanings of the kata.


  Gumbatte


  Dan Smith


Friday, January 19, 2024

Angi Uezu Bo/Sai Kumite 1966 Cleveland, Ohio

 






Re: Okinawanized Kata names and Uchina-guchi Regarding Chinkuchi




Dante Da. Dante Victor,


Thank you for your email. It is sunny here as well a bit too much for Southern California if you ask me. Good thing I can go practice in my pool. 



Thank you for asking the questions and pointing out clawing techniques. I can say that I also learned clawing techniques from my teacher. I really have no idea if they are the same as you learned as I would need to see if they were they similar since I have no working reference. 



The term for pinch is not the same or related to the term "chinkuchi". I was beginning to wonder if someone was ever going to ask about the term Chinkuchi since these terms seems to be the most popular among the "Okinawan" terms used these days. Chinkuchi is generally written using katagana チンクチ


チ(Chi) ン(n) ク(ku) チChi


There have been various things written on Chinkuchi so I will not go into this too much as the definition is very different then the etymology of the word. The Okinawan language or Uchina-guchi (Uchinaaguchi) have compound words just like other Asian languages (Japanese, Chinese, etc). The difficult part with trying to figure out the etymology of the word chinkuchi is that is written in kana and not kanji. However, the kanji that some people come up with do not match how those kanji would be pronounced in Okinawan, but some are very accurate. However, as one studies more about the Okinawan language there are more questions about if what others come up with are accurate or not as it pertains to the Okinawan language. 


"Chin" by itself can mean several things in the Okinawan language such as gold, a measurement of weight, and a few others. This does not mean that all words that have Chin have anything to do with the word "chin" by itself. For example, Chinshi is the word for "lap" but this has nothing to do with gold or measurements. 


Anyhow, here are a few words that may interest you.


The word for tendon is Chiru which is represented by 筋. 


 



The word for Ki is Chii or Chi- (This is not Chi and if it was part of the work Chinkuchi it would be written differently in katagana such as チ- ンクチ, please note the "-") and is represented by 気


The word for inspection is Chinbun which is made up of two characters. 検 which means to inspect, examine, or test (Chin in Okinawan and Ken in Japanese) and 分 (Bun in Japanese and Okinawan) which sometimes means "part". (Note some words that have parts tat are pronounced with "ken" in Japanese are pronounced "Chin" in Okinawan)

The word for Bone is kuchi which represented by the character 骨. This is NOT the same kuchi meaning mouth which is represented by the character 口


I have seen some people write that chinkuchi means tendons and bones which is represented by two characters 筋骨 which in Japanese in pronounced Kinkou or Sujibane. Now taking the first character pronounced "kin" in Japanese one would logically think that since most words that are pronounced "kin" in Japanese such as gold are pronounced Chin in Okinawan. Therefore Chinkuchi is the Okinawan word for Kinkou. However, looking at Okinawan words that use 筋 as part of the word, Chin never comes up. For example, the Japanese word for the bridge of the nose is hanatsuji which is pronounced hanagita in Okinawan which is represented by these characters: 鼻(Hana) 筋 (Gita). Logically someone could think that this is pronounced hanachin in Uchinaguchi since as I stated before any word pronounced "kin" in Japanese is pronounced "Chin" in Okinawan. So is Chinkuchi really only the Okinawan pronunciation of the Japanese word kinkou or sujibane then dare is say that Chinkuchi has roots in Japanese and not really an Okinawan word? (Can of worms is now open!)


I know that this response was very lengthy, and I could go further in detail with Okinawan words and references, but I think it would be very boring to most people unless they are interested in really studying the Okinawan language. I am willing to discuss this further if there are those that are interested. 


Respectfully,


Robert Orozco

 



https://isshin-concentration.blogspot.com/2012/01/normal-0-false-false-false-en-us-x-none.html

https://isshin-concentration.blogspot.com/2021/05/further-thoughts-on-chinkuchi.html

https://isshin-concentration.blogspot.com/2023/08/joe-swift-on-chinkuchi.html

https://isshin-concentration.blogspot.com/2022/01/chinkuchi-kakin.html

https://isshin-concentration.blogspot.com/2021/12/a-j-advincula-on-chinkuchi.html

https://isshin-concentration.blogspot.com/2023/12/chinkuchi-explored-or-discussed.html