The question is posed "So
are we back to "Hidden Moves" inside kata discussion/argument? Where
the masters only showed these to their favored students? "
We
need to make some fine distinctions here for intelligent conversation.
I
have experienced several different versions of this training, to understand
that not only one approach to training is being discussed.
In
each case being a student was not a democracy, where their wished had any
impact on what the student wanted.
First, there is the traditional program that the instructor
experienced himself, and that training was taught in a specific order. There
his instructor did not discuss what was available with students before they
reached a designated lever in their training. Most likely that was how they too
were taught.
So
someone in that tradition would not share information until the student
qualified for that level of training. They are secrets in the sense that they
were never discussed until the appropriate levels of training were reached. And
that may have involved decades of training.
Next is the traditional instructor who shared some knowledge,
but then the student choose not to work
and master that knowledge. In return the instructor would choose not to
share more knowledge.
I am
thinking of one instructor I know who often taught a kobudo kata to a student,
then in time the student decided there were more interested in another weapon,
and stopped practicing what they were originally shown. And they were not shown
anything more. As they failed the test, they were not even informed what the
test was, it being their dedication to the way the instructor shared the
system. In this case any time a student choose to find another way, that
disqualified them from other training. Not fair, but the way they were taught.
Of
course today with so much information being exchanged, the idea offends some.
Then again who is to say that it is not right to offend them?
A
different sort of instructor is one who worked themselves to understand how
kata applications could be used. When you experience such an instructor, most
times they are so focused they cannot stop sharing what they are continually
discovering.
But
at the same time there are no secrets to what they show. If you experience what they have via a
clinic. That is almost the same as getting nothing. For every potential application
builds forward. Without the one to one experience, you will unlikely really get
what you have been shown.
One
very traditional instructor I experienced, explained that his father would be
called on for ‘secrets’ when he would give a clinic. He never hid anything,
gave them the full technique series. Knowing no one present would actually
retain it, except where they were actually at the level to ‘get it’. Otherwise
it became ‘vapor ware’ or ‘ the technique of no technique’. I have experienced
that from various instructors from different cultures.
Knowledge
involves work sweat equity. Not casual discussion. There are layers and layers
of understanding. Just wanting simple answers is rarely that you will
understand what is shown.