I am nor a karate historian, and when I wrote this in 2017 it was based on what I had learned at that time. Today I likely would make some changes, as I have learned more, but I did not put this together to be a historical document, rather to address how the entire society surrounding karate's development need to be part of the understanding some of the forces behind karate developing.
When I think on Okinawa in the late 1800s the line
from Dickens “Tale of Two Cities” comes to mind. (not that I have read it).
“It was the best of times, it was the worst of
times.”
I believe we must look to a wider picture to
understand what karate came to be for Okinawa and then Japan. The full nature
of the time is an important consideration.
I suppose this is a result of my age, but I do
wonder if we focus on too small a focus on Okinawa’s pasts and miss other
things which occurred.
As I recall 1870 was a bad year for Okinawa. Japan
pushed their dominance over Okinawa. The Okinawan king was removed and
relocated to Japan. The aristocratic class had their government pensions
stripped leaving many of them facing poverty for the first time. The Japanese
modernized the schools, which means they became a tool to change Okinawan
customs, as in eliminating the male top knot, and working toward eliminating
the Okinawan languages replacing them with Japanese. Heavy handed social
engineering. And Japan was getting a lot of practice at that. Soon to become
the standard of dominance for Korea, Manchuria and many island nations they
would dominate in the years to come.
I imagine knowledge of karate was even more a class
handshake among the adepts. A way to maintain an identity of their own against
the changes being forced by Japan.
With more people having access to education, I
believe the choice of sharing karate in the schools was as much a way to build
something uniquely Okinawan as anything.
Karate was not seen so much for a needed self
defense art, There were not samurai roaming the streets with swords. I think
that Okinawa, for the most part, was a quiet place. But they had to chaff under
the heel of Japan proper. That was where there was the ‘right stuff’, language,
customs, etc. stuff of Empire. Okinawa would have been a poor relation to Japan
itself.
So Itosu created a special sort of Karate for the
schools and promoted it as the tool for creating a stronger Okinawa. Through sharing karate with the young would
be a contribution to the society and show Japan the worth of Okinawa.
Now let us think about what Japan was like during
this time. They considered themselves the master race of their part of the
world.
Before long they would take over Korea turning into
their toy.
Manchuria would be another conquest, leading to
China proper.
The many islands were play things to their whim,
They played with a very skewered idea what morals
were,
namely anything they wanted was their right.
When the chance to show something of karate to Japan
the most educated individual was selected to clearly present the art itself.
That was Funakoshi Ginchin. Then he made contact with Professor Kano, creator
of Judo, and they found a common bond. And a new role for karate in Japan was
begun, where there had been none before.
The Okinawan instructors, Funakoshi and Mabuni, began
to work within the Japanese society, to promote Okinawa as having value, using
karate instruction in the Japanese Universities as their way to make this
point.
I really doubt they were concerned about those
students being able to defend themselves or other people.
They were determined to show that karate would
strengthen the Japanese University trained youth making Okinawa even more
valuable as time passed.
And let’s take Itosu’s assumptions as truth. Then
they were consciously working to make Japanese University students better
Japanese citizens, able to accomplish more of the nasty things Japan the country
wanted.
And I used that word quite specifically, there is no
doubt that what Japan was doing was nasty.
As everyone today assumes karate will make the
individual better it is only reasonable to assume that is what was proposed.
So karate trained students went into industry, into
colonial positions for the Japanese government, into the Government itself, into the Navy making the point of Itosu that
karate would be valuable for the growth of the nation.
Of course the role of those University trained
students, and the things they did for Japan through their world, are not
something anyone wants to discuss today. If there is anything to the claim that
karate was making them more capable individuals that cannot be separated at
what they were using their strengthened characters for, pushing forward the
aims of the Japanese Empire. Abusing many nations and peoples all in the name
of Japan. And building a stronger Japanese Navy for Japan to use for their
purposes.
It is a two edged sword. Proving karate strengthens
its people. You can’t separate those people from their actions.
Now consideration can be made that Okinawa was not
Japan. But as originally the Okinawa’s choose their most polished instructor
with greatest command of Japanese to present their art, they had some stake in
the success of the Diaspora that resulted.
Then the War, and yes Okinawa was used, abused and
destroyed from Japan’s actions.
From the ashes of that war karate rose like a
Phoenix to the young military occupation and did capture their imaginations.
The karate was not expressed at what had already
been accomplished, good and bad. It was just put out there as it was what it
was, and everything went from there.
No comments:
Post a Comment