When I was
taught my kata originally, no one made a point about the starting and ending
point of the kata should be the same spot.
A few years
later I read this in the books by Funakoshi Ginchin, that this was the desired
way to do the Shotokan kata.
But then when I
studied with an instructor teaching Shotokan, this was nothing I recall was
discussed.
A separate but
related idea that I began to work on, was I came to appreciate stances and the manner
of stepping even more as time passed. For one thing I became fascinated with
the potential applications from the manner of stepping and the stances
employed.
Then one night I
decided to look at how close the kata I did with my Isshinryu were to that
standard. What I found was the kata did start and stop on the same point for me
for the most part.
But while the
manner of stepping and stances became a focus of my teaching, performing kata
to start and stop on the same point, was not something I worried about.
Among which I
did not recognize any variation of the stances for kata. A Seisan Stance was to
be the same Seisan Stance every time. Likewise the use of the crescent step was
the only method of forward movement I taught. My reason was I cannot recall
ever being told anything else was the way to step when I learned.
Now roll a few
decades forward.
My adult classes
were small, and frankly I was often less than I could have been as an
instructor, too often using kata practice for my own practice.
Becoming
disabled taught me many things. No longer able to perform most of the class, I
instead was watching what was happening much more. And seeing much more too.
One evening my
senior students, Mike and Young, were working on Wansu kata. They had very good
technique, extremely good execution. They showed they understood what the
movements were for in their practice.
But this time
watching I saw something else. As they did the kata, they were gradually moving
forward. Ending well in advance of where they started.
I understood
what they were doing, so I had an idea. I issued a challenge.
At the back of
the class we has a mat on the floor from the wrestling program.
It had a large
circle impressed on it, and there were two parallel lines in the middle to
allow the wrestlers to start their matches from.
Those two
parallel lines were to be my challenge, the starting and ending point which I
would perform Wansu kata from.
So I did my
kata, and started and stopped in the same place, when I did it.
Then I
challenged them to do the same.
They did their
Wansu kata. In fact several times each. And each time they did it they moved
forward, ending well in advance of where they started.
Only then did I
explain the difference. What they were doing with each kick is putting their
foot down well in advance of where they started that kick. So each techniques
was moving them forward.
When I did the
kata, as I concluded each kick, I put my foot directly down as it I had done
one crescent step forward. That was the difference enabling me to keep my kata
footprint smaller. And which I felt was more consistent with the application
potential I wanted with the form.
Now their kata
performances were fine, powerful and sharp. They were just doing something else
from what I was doing.
I believe this
explains were some kata creep, or movement of kata performance, comes over
time.
Even slight
variances of the original goal, ends up
changing the kata. Not so it does not
have value, just a different value than
what was originally intended.
Other
thoughts on Wansu kata;
No comments:
Post a Comment