Awhile ago
in perhaps I was taking advantage of the Saturday afternoon free practice at
the Shaolin School in Wilkes Barre. I had been studying tai chi and a variety of
Chinese forms with Ernest Rothrock Laoshi, As I was working out I saw Laoshi
working with one of his senior students and they were performing a punch I had
never seen in karate. I recognized the power of that strike. Noted it and then
went back to my own training.
Run forward
maybe 15 years an my mind went back to that strike. As I was living in NH and
he in Pittsburgh, I sent him a message inquiring about that strike. What
follows it his response.
"Okay, here's what I know. I first learned this one also as a fighting technique from Master Pai. It was done with a cross step and aimed for the ribs. The punch came from the shoulder, rather than the hip with the full twist, but was still inverted. The follow up technique was a rolling backfist to the head using the same hand. I still teach this technique to my advanced students because it is a very fast hand technique and almost impossible to stop.
In the Mantis system and the Eagle Claw system the technique is usually executed from the shoulder or ear and strikes downward. Even though the punch is inverted, there's no twisting involved. You just turn the fist and strike with the thumb side down.
I only have one form that uses this technique from the hip with the full twist and that is a dragon from the White Dragon system.
Maybe I'll show it to you
when I get out there. Maybe it's a dragon punching technique.
This is an interesting question to see where this punch came from and maybe find the style that developed it."
I just ran across that message in my files and of course that got me thinking so I attempted to do an internet search on that strike. I was unable to locate anything on karate for my search, But I did find it being used in MMA. The article follows.
http://www.wayofleastresistance.net/2015/11/overhand-inverted-punch-underused-gem.html
Overhand inverted punch - underused gem
One of the techniques I noticed frequently in the Rousey vs. Holm fight was the overhand inverted punch. In karate I suppose it would be an otoshi ura zuki (an inverted dropping punch).1
Holm used it time and time again to devastating
effect - both moving to the outside of Rousey's lead (something I'll examine in
a moment), and sometimes just square down the middle on the inside, as shown in
the three pictures to the right. However it lands, the technique is
devastating. It's a very useful punch precisely because it is so unexpected.
I suppose this raises the question why that would
be the case. I'll get to that soon. But first, let us not forget
what an oddity this technique really is - in both combat sports and traditional
martial arts.
In an industry often obsessed with rejecting any
level of "corkscrew" in punches, it seems out of place to expect
one that corkscrews to its maximum possible extent - ie. so much that the thumb ends up
pointing down. It seems even odder to see it used to such a manifestly
effective manner.
Consider this: I know many martial artists who are dogmatically opposed even to turning the fist so that it lands palm down (ie. the standard karate punch). Rather, these martial artists insist that punches should always land with the fist vertical. (thumb up). Examples range from wing chun gong fu to the Shorinjiryu karatedo of Kori Hisataka to some schools of boxing (I've trained with several boxers who insist that they only jab with a vertical fist: that to turn the punch over further is just "bad form").2
Yet there it was in the Rousey vs. Holm fight: a
punch that didn't just corkscrew a little; it corkscrewed to the very limit! And
Rousey seemed to fall into it repeatedly.
What I think this shows is that any form of dogma
regarding the "corkscrew" is just that: dogma. It is unproven
theory at best, blind ideology at worst. Such thinking ignores common
sense, as I noted many years ago (see my original article here) and misses out on many useful applications.
What makes the overhand inverted punch a
particularly useful variant is that, unlike a hook or even most cross punches, it is defaults to a motion that is more or less straight. A hook necessarily circles in from the
outside. A straight cross follows the hypotenuse of a triangle
from the outside. But the overhand inverted punch doesn't approach from
the outside. To the extent that it "circles in", it does so from above. Otherwise, in terms of lateral movement,
the punch is really coming in straight. As a variation this can be most
unexpected. Moreover it can be thrown with considerable force, using a
high chamber to allow plenty of room for acceleration.
Which brings me to the whole question of where the punch is most profitably aimed.
I can't think
off-hand of any karate form in which the punch appears. [Readers, please refresh my memory here!]
But it certainly occurs in the Chen Pan Ling
taijiquan form - in 3 places, no less.
All of those punches are aimed low. Indeed,
the most notable of the techniques is simply called "step forward and
punch to groin" (in some schools it is known as "old woman punches to
the groin" which has always amused me!).
As the name implies, the punch seems to be
primarily aimed at the groin. Or maybe the bladder/kidneys/ liver/spleen.
Or maybe the solar plexus or xyphoid process even. Yet in the
recent Rousey vs. Holm fight it was used by the latter to great effect as a
punch to the face. What gives?
As I discuss in the video below, the answer lies,
I think, in the fact that punch is a dropping punch. That natural curve we spoke
about, coming in from above and raking down, is what matters (primarily).
It isn't about "punching the groin". It is about counter
punching with a falling moment. The benefit of this moment is that it can
catch a variety of targets along the centre line as it drops - depending where
your opponent is. The groin is, if you will, simply "where the bus
stops" - the final possible target.
Yes, the face is an excellent target. But as I discuss
in the video, with an aggressive opponent who is entering strongly, you might
not have enough room to accelerate the punch all that much if it lands on the
face, as opposed to dropping lower down onto the body. Of course, you
might not need to: your opponent's incoming momentum might well be sufficient
(ie. you might be able to rely on that rather than your own generated
momentum). But otherwise it is a matter of physics that if you have more room to accelerate
your punch, you will reach a higher velocity on impact and generate a more
forceful punch. Compare how far Armando's arm has moved in the pictures
below when comparing the face punch and the solar plexus punch. Consider
the amount of shoulder he's been able to throw in too.
And it's not as if low, overhand inverted punches
of this kind are unheard of anyway. You see them all the time. The
might not even be intended as low punches, but end there after raking past the
face.
Anyway, that's my view on why the punch is aimed low in the Chen Pan Ling form - and why it is called "step forward punch to the groin": the final position is low - perhaps groin height (although even Chen Pan Ling in his textbook seems to finish at around solar plexus or tanden/dantien level - nowhere near the groin really).
In other words, the punch is named, as many taiji
techniques are named, by reference to their superficial appearance
(particularly at the finishing point) - not their function.
You'll note from the above video that the
taijiquan application necessarily goes to the outside of a right. This is
evident from the hand deflection accompanying the movement - if one follows the
simplest and most logical interpretation (in my humble opinion!).
This either means you're moving to the lead of a
southpaw's lead jab or you're dealing with a right cross. Personally, I
like to train it against the latter. In either event, you're moving to
the outside of your opponent's right.
T his is actually what Holly Holm did at least once to Ronda Rousey - albeit that as a southpaw, she moved to the outside of Rousey's left. And being a boxer, she relied purely on evasion, and not on evasion and deflection
Of course, the overhand inverted punch has many other functions too. Regular readers will know that I'm not fond of always interpreting blocks as throws, locks, strikes etc. That doesn't mean they can't be so used: I'm simply opposed to the ideology that interprets them primarily as something other than what appears to be their main purpose - defence.
Ditto with punches. I believe they are
primarily punches. This doesn't mean they can't be used for a whole host
of different purposes - including deflections, locks and throws. In
respect of the last of these, you'll note from the video below that I interpret
one of the overhand inverted punches from the Chen Pan Ling taijiquan
form (a move called "step back and hit tiger with reverse fist")
in precisely this manner: as a projection/throw......
No comments:
Post a Comment