Yes, there is more than a little secrecy regarding
kobudo, and perhaps its bred into its roots.
I participate on a number of different discussion
groups. Why I'm not sure, but some people think I'm not too offensive I guess.
Some of them operate with the same 'vow of secrecy' and as a result I cannot
share direct information of theirs as I wouldn't share that of yours, either.
So take this for what its worth.
Regarding Yamani Ryu, on gentleman I have great
personal trust in, who operates in the lineage that the Yamani Ryu does, tells
me that nobody outside of the direct lineage has received Yamani Ryu tradition.
Yes Oshiro Sensei is in that tradition, but apparently his public sharing is a modified
version of the family system as he is remaining true to their original values
and keeping it in house.
Similarily I've heard that Chinen Sensei is also
trained in the Yamani tradition but will not teach it, either.
Now I'm really not very interested in the Yamani
tradition, having more than enough to work on myself as it is, so I'm just
repeating (without details) the general outline of what Yamani represents.
Except for this individuals word, I have no proof
behind it either. But it does seem consistent with the Matayoshi concept of
what you show the public, too. And also with the Sutrisno tradition I did
study.
Truthfully, I belive much kobudo really doesn't care
that the public has the correct tradition. In no small part that may be to the
belief that you can only get their tradition from hands on training. Something
I fully subscribe too anyway.
And frankly, I'm of the belief, my goal training is to
learn how to use what I have to demolish any other tradition anyways. Of course
I'm old and belive in being devious in combat anyways <GRIN>.
Regarding Mario's incredible piece on Taira Shinken, I
can understand he likely had more studies than he ever taught. Been there and
wrote the book, and have friends in the same place. After all who in today's
world will spend 30 years studying my friends Northern Eagle Claw to get all of
it either (much less the 200+ other forms he's studied).
But isn't the case, have your students gotten enough
to make a case on their own studies. If so I believe they got all of it, or at
least the important part.
Reading Pat McCarthy's work on Motobu this morning,
one line struck me, where one of Motobu's students mentioned that a formal
Ryuhya was never formed because he was always changing what he taught. He was
always trying to improve what he was doing.
Some how I believe all of this ties together.
Thinking furiously,
Victor
2006
No comments:
Post a Comment