We have seen
incredible changes in the world since I began to study Isshinryu.
The was I was
trained was on the floor. Sensei Lewis did not spend much time talking about
history. Certainly we were interested, but there was little additional
information. Some books, and certainly the karate magazines. Of course those
authors also had agenda’s. Those were not discussed in class, and did not
become part of the Isshinryu practice.
The only secret,
was sweat equity. Pain was something you learned to deal with. Whatever the
seniors knew and thought about what else was in the world, was not our concern.
Then for years
things stayed the same way. Not being around others in Isshinryu, I built my
practice and teaching on what I had been shown.
Before Video
tapes, there was little else to consider. And when you think about it, it was
very much the same on Okinawa. You knew what your instructor shared. Perhaps
friends training, and then in time you may have met others, who shaped your
thoughts on your practice.
When it comes
down to it, it appears Shimabuku Tatsuo created a new paradigm teaching
non-Okinawans his karate, and a very short training time by Okinawan standards.
None of whom had the time to be considered instructors, and no one expected to
spend a lifetime studying the art they had learned. Well the new paradigm took
hold. But the individuals all had somewhat different experiences, and they for
the most part, followed what they remembered.
There was no
serious controlling mechanism to control the spread of Isshinryu. It seems to
resemble more of a loose framework, but I certainly wasn’t there. Almost
without any link back to Okinawa, except for the mail. No travel, No books or
records available, Nothing like today’s resources. Perhaps individuals at times
made claims, at that time there was no one to refute their statements. The one
thing we can say is that Isshinryu happened, many different ways.
Then video tapes
slowly became available. When the first Angi tapes were out, I discovered what
other views about Isshinryu existed. For myself, none of them resembled exactly
the way I had been trained, and though I watched them, what I followed was how
I was trained.
The magazines
were a way information could spread, but they were also controlled by interests
pushing an agenda.
When I had
accumulated time training with many I slowly began to see what I could do with
my Isshinryu. But the progression of learning was spotty.
Meeting Sherman
Harrill was a quantum leap forward to understanding my Isshinryu. But the most
important thing was it inspired my own studies. At almost our first meeting he
spent around 2 of 3 hours on the first movement of Chinto kata. I really
learned a great deal, of course not everything he knew, but I was hardly ready
for more.
And as time
progressed, I would review my notes, practice those applications that made most
sense to my training (everything did not fit the paradigm I followed, and that
is OK).
Then one day
about 2 years later I came to realize an aikido drill I had been teaching for
15 years, was also an explanation for Chinto’s opening. This was a basic study
in what I had been shown.
So I had been
practicing an answer, for a long time, not realizing it was Chinto.
Aikido
7 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dc2iT__Gok
So was this a
secret, or just an unrealized application study?
Does it matter,
it works for me, and my gradual understanding does not make it less.
Today, there are
movies, videotapes, dvd’s, youtube and other mechanisms. We have instant access
and communication with the entire world at our fingertips. Much in the past,
which had to be accepted blindly, can now be discussed, and examined. Including
being shared.
Many of the past
issues really are not worth the time pursuing. Take Okinawa, while acknowledging
foreign sources for karate, they are not really going to pursue them for any
great focus either. They hardly want people to go elsewhere and really study
those arts.
The past is
past, what we do with what we have now and for our students really builds the
future of the art.
Michael Demeter Here is the problem as I see it. A
few things and in no particular order. 1. Too many people came back and lied
about rank. Now you have a bunch of long time trained green belts. 2. Improper
use of terminology. Some of the terminology that people use literally means
nothing. 3. American Rank. I'll just leave that one right where it is.
Isshinryu is made up of one mans interpretation of what he was taught and he
owned it and called it Isshinryu. Many, many people have studied all that makes
up Isshinryu to help understand what its origins come from. Many more have not.
Do what you want but own it and don't call it what it isn't. That's just my opinion
I could be wrong.
Ken Marsh So true! To many "self
promoters".
Michael Demeter It should be about preserving
history, not re writing it. Not buying or (donating) to achieve rank. "I
know it's not right but it's what my organization or teacher does, so I have to
respect that." What?
John Kerker
All you can do is teach your people in your Dojo to the best of your ability
and be honorable and not live someone else's mistake
Victor The
thing is I never studied Isshinryu to worry about others rank.
I respect all
rank, just for myself don’t worry about it much. And in the end we all will
move on.
In the dojo,
rank is not an issue, everyone knows where everyone is in training. One either
does or does not.
What rank I have
is Tom Lewis’ business. I have the responsibility to try and live up to it.
I once wrote “If
someone remembers you 25 years after you died, then you were a master. And if
someone remembers you 50 years after you died, then you were a grand-master.”
It really is not an honor I am rushing to achieve, as I would not be here in
any case, even if it is deserved.
The whole Rank
thing came from the export of karate into the Japanese culture. The Okinawans
do not seem to have worried about it. Life might be simpler if we tried to
follow what the Okinawans’ did.
But Rank is
here. Let’s be more progressive in our studies than worry about others.
JudyAnne Bonafede It is my understanding that bunkai
means to "dissect" a movement.. to understand it's many
possibilities. Opening your eyes to see the abstract of movement from many
perspectives can truly preserve the art.
I was once told a story: My wife used to always cut the end of the ham off
before cooking. When asked she said, "This is the way my Mother taught me
to do it!" So he asked his Mother-in-law. Why do you cut the end of the
ham off before cooking? She said, "This is how my Mother showed me to cook
it" So he finally asked the Grandmother. Her reply was... "I cut the
end of the ham because it was too big for my pan!"
Michael Demeter Funny, it always goes back to not
worrying about rank. I'm not. That wasn't the point. Have a fantastic weekend!
I'm going to the dojo.
No comments:
Post a Comment