Thursday, September 28, 2023

Discussion on the order of teaching the Isshinryu kata

 


 

David Rayburn

I would like to hear thoughts on something, but before we start, everyone please play nice!I have seen kata lists from a lot of dojos, the order in which kata are taught. This is a double sided question, first, in what order of teaching kata do you teach Sanchin and at what point to you teach weapons and in what order do you teach the weapons? Everyone's thoughts on this are welcome.

 

Top of Form 1

Victor Donald Smith When I was taught and also how I teach Sanchin was the last empty hand kata taught. For our kobudo kata, I found it best to make those continuing Dan studies, for I wanted the kyu students to concentrate on making their karate stronger. What I found over the decades. kobudo is really not used for self-defense (other studies are for that with us (bando short stick) but with decades of work the kobudo is a valuable force enhancer for our karate, especialy as we age.

 

John Kerker I teach Sanchin 4th right after Naihanchi....

Kobudo depends on the maturity of the individual....I have 12 year olds training Kobudo

 

David Rayburn Do you have a specific place where you teach the kata, like after a certain kata or let it depend on the student?

 

Andy Sloane I teach Sanchin as the 6th kata and it is a requirement for 4th kyu. I teach bo basics and a modified version of the Seidokan bo kata Toma nu Kun at 7th kyu as a requirement for 6th kyu. I require Tokumine nu Kun for 4th kyu. Chan nu Sai is a requirement for 3rd kyu and then Kusanku Sai as a requirement for 1st kyu.

 

Victor Donald Smith Of course after 20 or 30 years does it matter?

 

David Rayburn Not really, I was just curios. I have never seen anyone who teaches Sanchin at the same time and I have never seen anything definite about where the weapons are taught. I was taught Sanchin between Wansu and Chinto, Tokomine no kun was after Brown belt and Ku san ku sai before black.

 

Andy Sloane Shimabuku Sensei taught Sanchin last up to about 1960. Then it was taught after Chinto until about 1962 or so. From then on, it was taught between Wansu and Chinto. So, there's nothing inherently wrong with teaching it in different places. However, it was the founder's intention that it not be taught first because he felt its principles were counterproductive to the things a beginning student should learn.


 


2 comments:

ML said...

From a different school perspective, I train Kung Fu and there are a few different tracks a student will learn.
The "curricular" track is the list of progressive "Kati" forms that will teach the student on the style movements and applications.
But Sifu usually will add different "extra" forms or styles, depending on each student needs.

For example, if a skinny student will benefit from more stamina and strength, Sifu may teach a bo (Staff) form and ask student to train with an Iron (heavy) staff. Or if a "bulked" student needs more agility, he learns a short hand form with high kicks, or a kali stick fighting.

This is one of the main reasons why experienced students from the same school will know different forms.

ML said...

Excellent discussion!

From a different Martial art, I train Kung Fu and in my specific case, there 2 tracks a student will learn.
The "curricular" track is the list of progressive "Kati" forms that will teach the student on the style movements and applications.
But Sifu usually will add different "extra track" forms or styles, depending on each student needs.

For example, if a skinny student will benefit from more stamina and strength, Sifu may teach a bo (Staff) form and ask student to train with an Iron (heavy) staff. Or if a "bulked" student needs more agility, he learns a short hand form with high kicks, or a kali stick fighting.

This is one of the main reasons why experienced students from the same school will know different forms.